Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, a pivotal case decided in 1914, significantly shaped the landscape of medical law and patient rights. This landmark ruling established the foundational principle of informed consent, emphasizing the patient’s right to bodily autonomy and self-determination.
The Story of Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
Mary Schloendorff, the plaintiff in this case, was admitted to New York Hospital for a stomach ailment. While she consented to an examination under ether, she explicitly refused any surgical intervention. Despite her clear objection, the attending physician performed a fibroid removal surgery while she was anesthetized. Post-operatively, Schloendorff developed gangrene in her left arm, allegedly due to the surgery, resulting in amputation. This led to the legal battle that would reshape medical practice.
The Legal Implications of Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
Justice Benjamin Cardozo, presiding over the case, authored the landmark opinion that affirmed every individual’s right to determine what shall be done with their own body. He famously declared that any unauthorized surgery constitutes an assault, for which the surgeon can be held liable. This declaration established the concept of battery in medical contexts, protecting patients from unwanted medical interventions. The ruling made it clear that a physician’s good intentions do not supersede a patient’s right to choose or refuse treatment.
How Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital Changed Medical Practice
The Schloendorff case laid the groundwork for the modern concept of informed consent. Though the term “informed consent” was not explicitly used in the ruling, the decision’s underlying principles became the cornerstone of this crucial medical ethic. 
Doctor and Patient Discussing Informed Consent This case established the patient’s right to be informed about the risks and benefits of proposed medical procedures before making a decision.
What are the long-term effects of Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital?
The legacy of Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital continues to resonate in contemporary medical law and ethics. This case provided the foundation for numerous subsequent legal decisions regarding patient rights and informed consent, shaping the doctor-patient relationship in profound ways. schloendorff v society of new york hospital It underscores the vital importance of open communication and shared decision-making between patients and their healthcare providers. The principles established in this case have empowered patients to actively participate in their own healthcare decisions, fostering a more collaborative and respectful dynamic within the medical field. 
Modern Healthcare Emphasizing Patient Rights
Conclusion
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital remains a pivotal case in medical jurisprudence, highlighting the critical importance of patient autonomy and informed consent. The case serves as a powerful reminder that patients have the right to make informed decisions about their own bodies and medical treatment.
FAQs
- What was the central issue in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital?
- Why is Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital considered a landmark case?
- How did this case influence the development of informed consent?
- What is the definition of medical battery?
- What are the implications of this case for modern medical practice?
- What was Justice Cardozo’s key contribution to this case?
- How does Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital relate to patient autonomy?
Common Scenarios Related to Informed Consent
- A patient is undergoing a complex surgery and is unsure about the risks and benefits.
- A patient refuses a blood transfusion due to religious beliefs.
- A patient is unconscious and unable to provide consent for emergency treatment.
Further Reading
schloendorff v society of new york hospital
Need help? Contact us 24/7: Phone: 02043854663, Email: [email protected], Address: Khu 34, Bac Giang, 260000, Vietnam.